Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.24 seconds)
Habib Ahmed vs M/O Information And Broadcasting on 18 August, 2023 cites

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

"11. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the record. It is not 12 Item No.35/ C-4 OA No. 1025/2018 in dispute that as on 10-3-2005 all the appellants had completed more than 10 years' engagement. It is also not in dispute that due to non- constitution of the Staff Selection Board and non- holding of examination, the appellants could not apply for regular selection. As on date, the appellants have completed 19 to 24 years' service. Therefore, the ratio of the judgment in State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3) cannot be invoked for denying them the benefit of policy contained in GR dated 10-3-2005."
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And Ors on 26 October, 2016

9. Learned counsel for respondents further averred that the contractual employees cannot claim regularization in absence of any scheme or any process which has categorically been stated by Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Punjab Vs Jagjit Singh. It is specifically averred by the Hon'ble Apex Court that „Once there are vacancies in sanctioned posts such vacancies cannot be filled in except without regular recruitment process, and thus neither the court nor the executive can frame a scheme to absorb or 23 Item No.35/ C-4 OA No. 1025/2018 regularize persons appointed to such posts without following the regular recruitment process‟.
Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 2405 - J S Khehar - Full Document
1   2 Next