Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.55 seconds)Hussan Mithu Mhasvadkar vs Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board & Anr on 7 September, 2001
[1] Hussain Mithu Mhasvadkar Vs. Bombay Iron & Steel
Labour Board & another [(2001) 7 SCC 394].
Mukand Ltd vs Mukand Staff & Officers Association on 10 March, 2004
The question of class to which the employees belong is
to be decided not on the basis of grade in which they
were placed, but on the basis of their duties,
responsibilities and powers as laid down in Section 2
D.P. Maheshwari vs Delhi Admn. & Ors on 14 September, 1983
Standard Chartered Bank vs Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. & ... on 5 May, 2006
[6] Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Andhra Bank
Financial Services Ltd. & ors.[ (2006) 6 SCC 94].
Badat And Co vs East India Trading Co on 10 May, 1963
[8] Badat & Co., Bombay Vs. East India Trading Co.[ AIR
1964 SC 538 (V 51 C 68)].
Somnath Tulshiram Galande vs Presiding Officer, Iind Labour Court ... on 31 January, 2008
1. Somnath Tulshiram Galande v/s Presiding Officer,
IInd Labour Court, Pune and others. [2008 I CLR
656].
Chandrashekhar Chintaman Vaidya vs National Organic Chemical on 26 February, 2010
It is purely a matter of his duties/job profile and the work actually
performed by him continuously. The Division Bench of this Court in the
matter of Chandrashekhar Chintaman Vaidya v/s National Organic
Chemical reported in 2010 (II) CLR 121 has laid down the tests for
deciding the status of an employee. It would be apposite to reproduce
paragraphs 11 and 36 of the said judgment as under:-