Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)
Prakash Chandra Kuanr vs Secretary, Board Of Secondary ... on 25 July, 1996 cites

Sanatan Gauda vs Berhampur University And Ors on 2 April, 1990

6. The next question that arises for consideration is whether the petitioner is entitled to have his result declared. A similar problem came up for decision before the Supreme Court in Sanatan Gduda v. Berhampur University. : AIR 1990 SC 1075. In that case.the candidate pursued his studies for two years in the Law College,The University also granted him the admit card for the Pre Law and Inter Law Examinations. He was permitted to appear in those two Examinations. He was also admitted to the Final Year of the Course. the stage of declaration of his result of the Pre Law and Inter Law raminations, the University raised objection to his ineligibility to be admitted to the Law Course. In paragraph-10 of the Judgment. Justice Sawant held that the University is estopped from refusing to declare the result of the candidate's examination or from preventing him from pursuing his final year course. Sharma. J. (as he then was) in s separate opinion observed (vide paragraph-14) as follows :
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 153 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Randhir Singh vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 27 May, 1994

In Randhir Singh v. State of Rajasthan : AIR 1995 Raj. 44, the candidate was admitted to the course of Physical Training Instructor and after he had undergone full training for about a year, his admission was cancelled on the ground that the sports certificate given by him was not properly authenticated. A learned Single Judge held that the concerned authority ought to have carefully scrutinised the documents at the time of admission itself and for their fault the candidate cannot be blamed. Accordingly, cancellation of his admission to the course was quashed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Naiffa vs Central Board Of Secondary Education ... on 12 July, 1991

In Naiffa v. Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi :AIR 1992 Mad. 52, a candidate after completing her course was permitted to sit in the C. B. S. Examination. Her result was withheld on the ground that she was "an irregular student". The Madras High Court held that the concerned candidate should not be penalised for the mistake committed by the school and accordingly her result was directed to be published.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1