Smti Runavallerie N Sangma vs The State Of Meghalaya And Ors on 14 April, 2015
Reliance placed by Mr. Balwinder
Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner in CWP No.318 of 2016 in his
effort to distinguish the ruling in the case of Vineet Kumar while relying
MONIKA VERMA
2016.02.06 12:52
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
CWP No.318 of 2016 -3-
on a decision of the Meghalaya High Court in Runavallerie N. Sangma
v. State of Meghalaya & ors., 2015 LIC 2728 is misconceived. In that
case, the learned Single Judge of the Meghalaya High Court was not
apprised that the law stated in Union of India & anr. v. Arunmozhi
Iniarasu & ors., (2011) 7 SCC 397 = AIR 2011 SC 2731, where the legal
position has been explained which is of universal application and applies
to the present case. Accordingly, no direction can be issued to the State
to relax age to bring the petitioner within the zone of consideration.