Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.40 seconds)

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr on 14 April, 2003

He has also relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sukanya Holdings (p) Ltd. Vs. Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr. reported in (2003)5 SCC 531, wherein it was held that there is no provision in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for splitting up the causes or the parties and referring the part of the subject matter of the suit relating to the arbitration agreement to the arbitrator when the subject matter of the suit includes both matters relating to arbitration agreement as well as other dispute which is capable of resolution by the Civil Court in the Civil Suit.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 493 - Full Document

Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co. & ... vs Haldia Petrochemical Ltd. & Ors on 4 June, 2013

By relying upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Chatterjee Petrochem Co. & Anr. Vs. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors. Reported in (2014)1 Calcutta Law Times 83 (SC), he contended that when an arbitration proceeding had already been initiated by a party to the arbitration agreement, the parties to the arbitration proceeding may be directed to continue with the arbitration proceeding inasmuch as non- signatory party to arbitration agreement does not jeopardize arbitration clause in any manner and the suit filed for permanent injunction against arbitration proceeding is not sustainable in law.
Calcutta High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 2 - J Bagchi - Full Document
1   2 Next