T.A. Narasimhan vs Narayana Chettiar And Anr. on 18 February, 1965
13. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli dated 16.2.1998 in I.A.No.787 of 1997 in O.S.No.973 of 1995, is set aside and the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, is directed to permit the revision petitioner to examine the suit promissory note for comparing the same by handwriting expert at his cost, of course in the presence of a responsible officer of the Court, in the Court itself, as laid down in T.A. Narasimhan v. Narayana Chettiar, 1968 (II) M.L.J. 48 and Balarama Reddy, N. v. V. Sarathy Enterprises etc. and 5 others, 1994 (2) L.W. 287, and submit a report thereon, within three months from the date of receipt of this order. I further direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, to conduct the trial and pass final decree and judgment in the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report of the handwriting expert.