Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.34 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mr. Kuriakose V. Cherian, Retired ... vs Air India Employees Self Contributory ... on 3 April, 2003
10- Reliance has also been placed upon various judgments
delivered in the case of Management of Shri Chalthan Vibhag
Khand Udyog Sahakari Mandli Ltd. Vs. G. S. Barot and Others
reported in MANU/SC/0512/1979, Prabhulal Patiram and Co. Vs.
Industrial Tribunal reported in MANU/MP/0084/1964, Pharmed
Private Ltd. Vs. The Workmen reported in MANU/SC/0317/1969,
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
Writ Petition No.28237/2018
(Factory Manager, AVTEC Limited Vs. State of M. P. and Another)
-5-
French Motor Car Co., Limited Vs. Workmen reported in AIR 1963
SC 1327, Lipton Limited and Ors. Vs. Their Employees reported
in AIR 1959 SC 676 and The Remington Rand of India Ltd. Vs.
The Workmen reported in AIR 1968 SC 224.
Remington Rand Of India Ltd vs The Workmen on 17 October, 1969
10- Reliance has also been placed upon various judgments
delivered in the case of Management of Shri Chalthan Vibhag
Khand Udyog Sahakari Mandli Ltd. Vs. G. S. Barot and Others
reported in MANU/SC/0512/1979, Prabhulal Patiram and Co. Vs.
Industrial Tribunal reported in MANU/MP/0084/1964, Pharmed
Private Ltd. Vs. The Workmen reported in MANU/SC/0317/1969,
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
Writ Petition No.28237/2018
(Factory Manager, AVTEC Limited Vs. State of M. P. and Another)
-5-
French Motor Car Co., Limited Vs. Workmen reported in AIR 1963
SC 1327, Lipton Limited and Ors. Vs. Their Employees reported
in AIR 1959 SC 676 and The Remington Rand of India Ltd. Vs.
The Workmen reported in AIR 1968 SC 224.
Workmen Represented By Secretary vs Management Of Reptakos Brett.And Co. ... on 31 October, 1991
In Workmen vs. Management of Reptakos Brett and
Company Limited, 1992 LAB IC 289 the Supreme Cout
lamented as under:-
Hindustan Hosiery Industries vs F. H. Lala And Another on 8 February, 1974
require that the workmen should receive their proper share in the
national income which they help to produce, with a view to
improving their standard of living and the depletion, which every
increase in wages makes in the profits of the industry. The
observation of the Supreme Court in Hindustan Hosiery
Industries vs. F.H. Lala, 1974-I-LLJ-340 are very pertinent and
which are as follows:-
M/S. Lipton Limited And Another vs Their Employees on 2 February, 1959
32. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the party
submitted that enhancement of wages should be prospective only
from the date of publication of award. He placed reliance on the
decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lipton Ltd. vs. Their
Employees, AIR 1959 SC 676.
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010
(d) The parameters of interference by High Courts in exercise
of its power of superintendence have been repeatedly laid down
by this Court.
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
(i) High Court's power of superintendence under Article 227
cannot be curtailed by any statute. It has been declared a part of
the basic structure of the Constitution by the Constitution Bench
of this Court in the case of L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India &
others, reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261 and therefore abridgement
by a Constitutional amendment is also very doubtful.