Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited on 12 June, 2023
cites
M/S. Rotork Controla India (P) Ltd vs Commnr. Of Income Tax, Chennai on 12 May, 2009
51. It may be noted that in all the impugned judgments before us the
assessee(s) has succeeded except in the case of Civil Appeal Nos. of 2009 (Arising
out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 14178-14182 of 2007- Rotork Controls India (P) Ltd. v.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, in which the Madras High Court has
overrules the decision of the Tribunal allowing deduction u/s 37 of the 1961 Act.
However, the High Court has failed to notice the "reversal" which constituted
part of the data systematically maintained by the assessee over the last decade."
Thus, we see that the Assessee company has not committed any error in
making provisions inasmuch as large number of sophisticated goods were being
manufactured in the past and if the facts established show that defects existing in
some of the items manufactured and sold then the provision made for warranty in
respect of the army of such sophisticated goods would be entitled to deduction from
the gross receipt under Section 37 of 1961 Act. Consequently, the issue of
provision of warranty in the facts and circumstances of the case goes in favour of
the Assessee and against the Revenue.
Section 143 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 43 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sai University Act, 2018
The Companies Act, 1956
1