Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)

M/S. Rotork Controla India (P) Ltd vs Commnr. Of Income Tax, Chennai on 12 May, 2009

51. It may be noted that in all the impugned judgments before us the assessee(s) has succeeded except in the case of Civil Appeal Nos. of 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 14178-14182 of 2007- Rotork Controls India (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, in which the Madras High Court has overrules the decision of the Tribunal allowing deduction u/s 37 of the 1961 Act. However, the High Court has failed to notice the "reversal" which constituted part of the data systematically maintained by the assessee over the last decade." Thus, we see that the Assessee company has not committed any error in making provisions inasmuch as large number of sophisticated goods were being manufactured in the past and if the facts established show that defects existing in some of the items manufactured and sold then the provision made for warranty in respect of the army of such sophisticated goods would be entitled to deduction from the gross receipt under Section 37 of 1961 Act. Consequently, the issue of provision of warranty in the facts and circumstances of the case goes in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 431 - S H Kapadia - Full Document
1