Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.51 seconds)

Saroj Rani vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation on 10 August, 2021

5. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant no. 4 & 5 are raising illegal & unauthorized construction at their property bearing no. 655/2 & 655/3, Village Chirag Delhi, New Delhi CS SCJ 353/17, Saroj Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors 5 / 34 CS SCJ 319/18 Jeet Ram Bhardwaj Vs Saroj Misc SCJ 112/17 Saroj Vs Jeet Ram Bhardwaj without obtaining any sanctioned plan from the competent authority. It is averred that due to the said unauthorized & illegal construction being carried out by the defendant no.4 & 5, property of the plaintiff has suffered severe damages in the form of cracks on the walls and walls of the property of the plaintiff have also got punctured at various places. It is submitted that the defendants no. 4 & 5 are carrying out the said construction by using sub-standard raw/ building material. It is submitted that on various occasions, the plaintiff requested the defendant no.4 & 5 to not raise the unauthorized & illegal construction but they refused to do so. Being aggrieved by the actions of the defendant no.4 & 5, plaintiff made several complaints before the competent authorities but to no avail. Hence, the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for permanent & mandatory injunction seeking aforementioned reliefs.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S Sachdeva - Full Document

Nirmala Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Wps/432/2017 ... on 18 May, 2018

5. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant no. 4 & 5 are raising illegal & unauthorized construction at their property bearing no. 655/2 & 655/3, Village Chirag Delhi, New Delhi CS SCJ 353/17, Saroj Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors 5 / 34 CS SCJ 319/18 Jeet Ram Bhardwaj Vs Saroj Misc SCJ 112/17 Saroj Vs Jeet Ram Bhardwaj without obtaining any sanctioned plan from the competent authority. It is averred that due to the said unauthorized & illegal construction being carried out by the defendant no.4 & 5, property of the plaintiff has suffered severe damages in the form of cracks on the walls and walls of the property of the plaintiff have also got punctured at various places. It is submitted that the defendants no. 4 & 5 are carrying out the said construction by using sub-standard raw/ building material. It is submitted that on various occasions, the plaintiff requested the defendant no.4 & 5 to not raise the unauthorized & illegal construction but they refused to do so. Being aggrieved by the actions of the defendant no.4 & 5, plaintiff made several complaints before the competent authorities but to no avail. Hence, the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for permanent & mandatory injunction seeking aforementioned reliefs.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4774 - M M Shrivastava - Full Document
1   2 3 Next