Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)

Junagade Healthcare Pvt.Ltd,, Nashik vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... on 25 October, 2018

3. The issue involved in this case is whether late fee under section 234E can be levied for F.Y. 2012-13. This issue is covered in favour of the assessee. The ITAT Pune in the case of Medical Superintendent Rural Hospital, vs. DCIT, CPC(TDS)[2018] 100 taxmann.com 78 (Pune Tribunal), following the decision of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi has observed as under :
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 19 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

Maharashtra Cricket Association, Pune vs Cit-1, Pune on 28 September, 2018

"11. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record. The issue arising in the present bunch of appeals is against levy of late filing fees under section 234E of the Act while issuing intimation under section 200A of the Act, in the first bunch of appeals. The second bunch of appeals in the case of Junagade Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. is against order of Assessing Officer passed under section 154 of the Act rejecting rectification application moved by assessee against intimation issued levying late filing fees charged under section 234E of the Act. The case of assessee before us is that the issue is squarely covered by various orders of Tribunal, wherein the issue has been decided in respect of levy of late filing fees under section 234E of the Act, in the absence of empowerment by the Act upon Assessing Officer to levy such fees while issuing intimation under section 200A of the Act. The Tribunal vide order dated 21.09.2016 with lead order in Maharashtra Cricket Association v. Dy. CIT [2016] 74 taxmann.com 6 (Pune - Trib.) relating to assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 for the respective quarters deliberated upon the issue and held as under:--
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 27 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1