Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)Section 17 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 1 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957
M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd vs Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala And Others on 25 April, 1961
In support of his contention Mr. Pathak relied upon the
following observations of Shah, J. in Harinagar Sugar Mills
Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala(1) :
Section 10 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Shivji Nathubhai vs The Union Of India & Others on 19 January, 1960
Indeed, this Court in Shivji
Nathubhai v. The Union of India(1) ruled that the Central
Government, exercising its power of review under r. 54 of
the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, was acting judicially as
a tribunal. The new rule, if at all, is clearer in that
regard and emphasizes the judicial character of the
proceeding. If it was a tribunal, this Court under Art. 136
of the Constitution can entertain an appeal against the
order of the Central Government made in exercise of its
revisional powers under r. 55 of the Rules.
1