Kulwant Singh Gill vs State Of Punjab on 13 September, 1990
(I) That the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Kulwant Singh
Gill Vs. State of Punjab reported in (1991) Supp 1 SCC 504
relevant being para 4.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Surjit Ghosh vs Chairman & Managing Director, United ... on 6 February, 1995
(II) Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the
judgment in the case of Surjit Ghosh vs. Chairman &Managing
Director, United Commercial Bank & Others reported in
(1995) 2 SCC 474 specifically para 6 on the issue that where
right to appeal has been provided to the higher authority,
employee concerned cannot be deprived of his substantive
right and the order of punishment passed by the higher
authority is liable to be set aside. In the instant case, the
impugned order of punishment at dictates of the higher
authority i.e. Deputy Commissioner, is assailable.
(III) In the instant case, the major punishment has been
5
imposed but neither the copy of the inquiry report has been
supplied nor second show cause has been issued prior to
imposing of the order of major punishment.
Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993
Learned counsel
for the petitioner relied upon judgment of Managing Director
of ECIL Hyderabad and Ors. Vs. B. Karunakar & Ors. Reported
in (1993) 4 SCC 727 specifically para 26 and in the case of
Punjab National Bank Ors. Vs. Kunj Behari Misra reported in
(1998) 7 SCC 84 para 17 on the issue that copy of inquiry and
second show cause is necessary before passing the major
punishment.
Punjab National Bank And Ors.The Chief ... vs Sh. Kunj Behari Misra, Sh. Shanti Prasad ... on 19 August, 1998
Learned counsel
for the petitioner relied upon judgment of Managing Director
of ECIL Hyderabad and Ors. Vs. B. Karunakar & Ors. Reported
in (1993) 4 SCC 727 specifically para 26 and in the case of
Punjab National Bank Ors. Vs. Kunj Behari Misra reported in
(1998) 7 SCC 84 para 17 on the issue that copy of inquiry and
second show cause is necessary before passing the major
punishment.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Kali Pada Mahato vs The State Of Jharkhand & Others on 26 August, 2014
In Kali Pada Mahato vs. State of
Jharkhand & Ors. reported in 2015 (1) JBCJ 478 [HC] is
relevant on the issue of withholding of three increments with
cumulative effect is a major punishment imposition of which
requires due compliance of service of second show cause with
a copy of inquiry report prior to infliction of punishment.
1