Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.35 seconds)
Pravinkumar Gordhandas Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 6 April, 2026 cites

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana vs Jagdev Singh on 29 July, 2016

NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/4740/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/04/2026 undefined 6.2.1 Insofar as the facts of the present case are concerned, Rule 28(2) of the Rules of 2002, though, permits re-fixation of pay- scale, it expressly prohibits any recovery from the concerned employee and therefore, the decision, in the case of 'High Court of Punjab and Haryana and Others Vs. Jagdev Singh' (Supra), relied on by the learned Advocate, Mr. Chauhan, shall not apply to the facts of the present case."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 921 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014

8.4.1 During the course of arguments, learned Advocate, Mr. Chudasama, also had submitted that the present petitioners belong to Class-III and Class-IV (Group- 'C 'and 'D') employees, as they are teachers and therefore, they are even otherwise, squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of 'State of Punjab & Others Vs. Rafiq Masih & Others' (Supra) in respect of Condition No.(1) that recovery from Class-III and Class-IV (Group- 'C 'and 'D') employees is impermissible. Therefore, such a recovery, as per the aforesaid decision, is impermissible.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7379 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Sahib Ram vs The State Of Haryana And Others on 19 September, 1994

"27. The last question to be considered is whether relief should be granted against the recovery of the excess payments made on account of the wrong interpretation/understanding of the circular dated 7-6-1999. This Court has consistently granted relief against recovery of excess wrong payment of emoluments/allowances from an employee, if the following conditions are fulfilled (vide Sahib Ram v. State of Haryana [1995 Supp (1) SCC 18 : 1995 SCC (L&S) 248], Shyam Babu Page 14 of 29 Uploaded by UMESH H. CHAVDA(HC00203) on Wed Apr 08 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 08 22:03:49 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/4740/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/04/2026 undefined Verma v. Union of India [(1994) 2 SCC 521 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 683 : (1994) 27 ATC 121], Union of India v. M. Bhaskar [(1996) 4 SCC 416 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 967] and V. Gangaram v. Regional Jt. Director [(1997) 6 SCC 139 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 1652]):
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 988 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Shyam Babu Verma vs Union Of India on 8 February, 1994

"27. The last question to be considered is whether relief should be granted against the recovery of the excess payments made on account of the wrong interpretation/understanding of the circular dated 7-6-1999. This Court has consistently granted relief against recovery of excess wrong payment of emoluments/allowances from an employee, if the following conditions are fulfilled (vide Sahib Ram v. State of Haryana [1995 Supp (1) SCC 18 : 1995 SCC (L&S) 248], Shyam Babu Page 14 of 29 Uploaded by UMESH H. CHAVDA(HC00203) on Wed Apr 08 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 08 22:03:49 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/4740/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/04/2026 undefined Verma v. Union of India [(1994) 2 SCC 521 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 683 : (1994) 27 ATC 121], Union of India v. M. Bhaskar [(1996) 4 SCC 416 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 967] and V. Gangaram v. Regional Jt. Director [(1997) 6 SCC 139 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 1652]):
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 850 - N P Singh - Full Document

Union Of India And Anr vs M. Bhaskar And Ors on 6 May, 1996

"27. The last question to be considered is whether relief should be granted against the recovery of the excess payments made on account of the wrong interpretation/understanding of the circular dated 7-6-1999. This Court has consistently granted relief against recovery of excess wrong payment of emoluments/allowances from an employee, if the following conditions are fulfilled (vide Sahib Ram v. State of Haryana [1995 Supp (1) SCC 18 : 1995 SCC (L&S) 248], Shyam Babu Page 14 of 29 Uploaded by UMESH H. CHAVDA(HC00203) on Wed Apr 08 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 08 22:03:49 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/4740/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/04/2026 undefined Verma v. Union of India [(1994) 2 SCC 521 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 683 : (1994) 27 ATC 121], Union of India v. M. Bhaskar [(1996) 4 SCC 416 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 967] and V. Gangaram v. Regional Jt. Director [(1997) 6 SCC 139 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 1652]):
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 446 - Full Document

V.Gangaram vs The Regional Joint Director & Ors on 25 April, 1997

NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/4740/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/04/2026 undefined "8. The law in this regard has been settled by this Court in catena of judgments rendered time and again; Sahib Ram vs. State of Haryana1, Shyam Babu Verma vs. Union of India2, Union of India vs. M. Bhaskar3 and V. Gangaram vs. Regional Jt. Director4 and in a recent decision in the matter of Thomas Daniel vs. State of Kerala & Ors.5.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 103 - Full Document
1   2 Next