Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.90 seconds)Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Suraj Mal vs State (Delhi Administration) on 13 February, 1979
26. The judgments relied on by the learned Counsel for the petitioner
in Suraj Mal v. State (Delhi Administration) reported in (1979) 4 Supreme
Court Cases 725 and A.V.Ravi v. State [Criminal Appeal No.454 of 2009,
decided on 04.12.2013 - High Court of Karnataka], lay down the proposition
that mere recovery of bribe money divorced from the circumstances under which
it was paid, is not sufficient to convict when the substantive evidence in
the case was not reliable.
Section 228 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
C.Rajan vs Union Of India on 20 December, 2013
In C.Rajan v. Union of India reported in 2013 SCC Online Mad 3830,
the petitioner therein filed two writs praying for appropriate direction for
investigation by Special Investigation Team with regard to fabricating of
false evidence and initiating the illegal criminal proceedings against him
and forbearing the official respondents from taking any further action. The
learned Judge on a threadbare analysis of the materials collected during the
investigation, has observed in paragraphs 74 and 83, thus:
Sajjan Kumar vs C.B.I on 20 September, 2010
30. The Honourable Supreme Court in Sajjan Kumar v. CBI reported in
(2010) 9 SCC 368 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 1371, has culled out the principles
regarding Sections 227 and 228 Cr.P.C., which would broadly apply to Sections
238 and 239 Cr.P.C. and in paragraph 21, observed as follows:
C.M.Girish Babu vs Cbi, Cochin, High Court Of Kerala on 24 February, 2009
27. The very same proposition has been laid down in C.M.Girish Babu v.
CBI reported in (2009) 3 Supreme Court Cases 779.