Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.28 seconds)

Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010

29.After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that judgments which are relied upon by the accused not applicable to the given facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the judgment "Rangappa Vs. Mohan 2010 (3) JCC 254(NI)", and "V.S Yadav Vs Reena 2010(4) JCC( NI) 323" I am of the considered view that objection in respect to the unaccounted loan is not sustainable and in the present case all the four ingredients of section 138 N.I Act has been proved by the complainant beyond reasonable doubt. Issuance of cheque towards discharge of legal liability proved by the complainant, dishonour of the cheque is proved by returning memo Ex.CW1/2, legal notice has been proved as Ex.CW1/3 because service of legal notices have been admitted by the accused at the time of notice giving in writing u/sec. 251 Cr.P.C and thus I am of the considered opinion that accused has failed to rebut the presumption and essential ingredients of offence u/sec. 138 N.I Act stands proved.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 9567 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 Next