Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.33 seconds)
Punjai Puliyampatti Municipality vs The Commissioner Of Municipalities on 18 February, 2016 cites

Ram And Shyam Company vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 8 May, 1985

Further reference was made to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram & Shyam & Co., vs. State of Haryana and Ors., reported in (1989) 3 SCC 267, wherein it was held that disposal of public property partakes the character of a trust in that in its disposal, there should be nothing hanky panky and it must be done at the best price, so that larger revenue coming into the coffers of the State Administration would serve public purpose. Further, identical grounds raised before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1471 of 2014, was rejected by judgment dated 12.11.2014 and confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by order dated 18.12.2014. The other decisions referred to by the learned counsel for the respondent, are in support of the conclusion taken by this Court, which ultimately can lead to the only decision in rejecting the prayer sought for.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 808 - D A Desai - Full Document

Sathar A.V vs The District Collector on 21 January, 2013

Reference was also made to the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench in the case of A.Sathar vs. District Collector, Coimbatore & Anr., reported in AIR 1998 Madras 217, where the Hon'ble Division Bench pointed out that the extension granted earlier by the Panchayat would not mean that appellant therein is entitled to continue in possession of the premises in question for ever by paying ridiculously low rent and extension of lease to the said appellant is against the interest of the Panchayat. Thus, it was held that the interest of the Panchayat cannot be jeopardised by permitting the appellant therein to continue in possession of the premises in question at the enhanced rate of 15%.
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - A Dominic - Full Document
1