Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)
Ajay Soni vs Girdharilal on 28 March, 2017 cites

Ajay Soni vs Girdharilal on 6 April, 2016

Further, in the case of Mohammed Ibrahim & Others (Supra), the fact was that even Supreme Court in Para-8 accepted that there may be some civil case having ingredients of criminal offences and if so, will have to be 6 M. Cr. C. No. 10184/ 2016 (Ajay Soni Vs. Girdharilal & Others) tried as criminal offences even if they also amounts to civil disputes, therefore, since this Court is of the opinion that there are ingredients of criminal offence in the act of the petitioner as power of attorney holder of Neeraj Verma in altering the boundaries of the property which was sold in favour of Mahaveer Jain, and thus the complaint cannot be said to be totally baseless, fraudulent or malafide.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Paramjeet Batra vs State Of Uttarakhand & Ors on 14 December, 2012

In the case of Paramjeet Batra (Supra), there was pendency of civil suit and during the pendency of civil suit on the same subject-matter, allegations of forgery and fabrication of documents were alleged and criminal case was filed; that is also distinguishable under the facts and circumstances of the present case, so also the law laid-down in the case of Joseph Salvaraj A. (Supra), wherein several civil suits were pending, where recourse to criminal proceedings was undertaken to short-circuit the pendency of civil cases; is also not applicable to the present case, therefore, this Court refuses to quash the order of taking cognizance against the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 177 - Full Document

Md.Ibrahim & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 September, 2009

Further, in the case of Mohammed Ibrahim & Others (Supra), the fact was that even Supreme Court in Para-8 accepted that there may be some civil case having ingredients of criminal offences and if so, will have to be 6 M. Cr. C. No. 10184/ 2016 (Ajay Soni Vs. Girdharilal & Others) tried as criminal offences even if they also amounts to civil disputes, therefore, since this Court is of the opinion that there are ingredients of criminal offence in the act of the petitioner as power of attorney holder of Neeraj Verma in altering the boundaries of the property which was sold in favour of Mahaveer Jain, and thus the complaint cannot be said to be totally baseless, fraudulent or malafide.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 1195 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Joseph Salvaraj A vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 4 July, 2011

In the case of Paramjeet Batra (Supra), there was pendency of civil suit and during the pendency of civil suit on the same subject-matter, allegations of forgery and fabrication of documents were alleged and criminal case was filed; that is also distinguishable under the facts and circumstances of the present case, so also the law laid-down in the case of Joseph Salvaraj A. (Supra), wherein several civil suits were pending, where recourse to criminal proceedings was undertaken to short-circuit the pendency of civil cases; is also not applicable to the present case, therefore, this Court refuses to quash the order of taking cognizance against the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 410 - D Verma - Full Document
1   2 Next