Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)Section 8 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
Yudhishter vs Ashok Kumar on 11 December, 1986
This
judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Chander Sen (supra) was
thereafter followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Yudhishter Vs.
Ashok Kumar, (1987) 1 SCC 204 wherein the Supreme Court reiterated
the legal position that after coming into force of Section 8 of the Hindu
Succession Act, 1956, inheritance of ancestral property after 1956 does
not create an HUF property and inheritance of ancestral property after
1956 therefore does not result in creation of an HUF property.
Section 6 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax. Kanpur Etc. ... vs Chander Sen Etc on 16 July, 1986
This
judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Chander Sen (supra) was
thereafter followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Yudhishter Vs.
Ashok Kumar, (1987) 1 SCC 204 wherein the Supreme Court reiterated
the legal position that after coming into force of Section 8 of the Hindu
Succession Act, 1956, inheritance of ancestral property after 1956 does
not create an HUF property and inheritance of ancestral property after
1956 therefore does not result in creation of an HUF property.
Sunny (Minor) & Anr. vs Sh. Raj Singh & Ors. on 17 November, 2015
8. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment in the case of Sunny
(Minor) (supra) are paragraphs 6 to 8 and which paras read as under:-
Sh. Surender Kumar vs Sh. Dhani Ram And Others on 18 January, 2016
The relevant paras of the judgment in the case of Surender Kumar
(supra) are paras 4 to 13 and these paras read as under:-
1