Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (1.05 seconds)Section 37 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 2 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs N.C.T., Delhi & Anr on 23 March, 2001
In Prahlad Singh
Bhati v NCT, Delhi, (2001) 4 SCC 280, Supreme Court highlighted one of the factors for
bail to be the public or the State's immense interest and similar other considerations.
Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018
In
Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh, (2018) 3 SCC 22, (Para 6), Supreme Court held
that the grant or refusal of bail is entirely within the discretion of the judge hearing the
matter and though that discretion is unfettered, it must be exercised judiciously,
compassionately, and in a humane manner. Also, conditions for the grant of bail ought
not to be so strict as to be incapable of compliance, thereby making the grant of bail
illusory.
Sumit Mehta vs State Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 13 September, 2013
In Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T.
of Delhi, (2013)15 SCC 570, Para 11, Supreme Court holds that while exercising power
Under Section 438 of the Code, the Court is duty-bound to strike a balance between the
individual's right to personal freedom and the right of investigation of the police. While
exercising utmost restraint, the Court can impose conditions countenancing its object as
permissible under the law to ensure an uninterrupted and unhampered investigation.
Sami Ullaha vs Superintendent, Narcotic Central ... on 7 November, 2008
In Sami Ullaha v Superintendent Narcotic Control Bureau, (2008) 16 SCC 471, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court holds that in intermediate quantity, the rigors of the provisions
of Section 37 may not be justified.