Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Sayyed Ali And Ors vs Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board Hyderabad And ... on 28 January, 1998
Indeed, the judgment of the Supreme Court in Sayyed Ali v. A.P. Wakf Board (supra) shows that A.P. Wakf Board has exclusive right to the property covered by title deed No. 42. Secondly, A.P. Wakf Board does not dispute the contention that compensation has been ordered to be apportioned among the encroachers on one hand and A.P. Wakf Board and the Government on the other hand. When A.P. Wakf Board itself has no objection for apportionment of compensation for Devada lands, I am afraid, I cannot hold otherwise, especially when the petitioner has no locus standi.
The Haj Committee Act, 2002
The Wakf Act, 1995
Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition And Conversion Into Ryotwari) Act, 1956
Section 3 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 69 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 97 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board, Hyderabad vs S. Syed Ali Mulla And Ors. on 6 August, 1984
It is further disclosed by petitioner that Wakf Board filed O.S. No. 147 of 1967 on the file of Subordinate Court, Visakhapatnam, claiming lands in Devada Village as the wakf properties and for cancellation of various leases/sub-leases in respect of the property and for recovery of possession. The suit was dismissed. The A.P. Wakf Board filed an appeal being A.S. No. 89 of 1976. A Division Bench of this Court in A.P. Wakf Board v. S.Syed Ali Mulla, , allowed the appeal setting aside the judgment and decree of the Trial Court. Aggrieved by the said judgment, Mokhasadars filed appeal before the Supreme Court.