Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana vs Prem Chand And Ors on 14 December, 1989
Ld. Counsel for the applicant has placed reliance on judgment titled
as "State of Haryana Vs. Prem Chand", where convict/ accused aged about 21
years was released on probation u/s. 376 IPC.
Ranjeet vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 3 March, 2014
Ld. MM has rightly relied on the judgment titled as "Ranjeet Vs.
State (NCT of Delhi)", Crl. A. 684/2012 decided on 03.03.2014, where it is
observed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that "It is a settled law that the
refusal on the part of the appellant without any just reason leads to an adverse
inference against the appellants, unless it is shown by the appellants that holding of
a TIP was a futile exercise because he had been shown to the witness."
Section 4 in The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Leela Ram (D) Through Duli Chand vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 6 October, 1999
I am of the view that is no major contradiction and IO must have taken
help of other police officials in preparing the writing work. Taking about
contradictions in the testimony of a prosecution witness it has been held by Hon'ble
Supreme Court in "Leela Ram Vs. State of Haryana" 1999 9 (SCC) 525, wherein,
it is held as under:
"it is indeed necessary to note that one hardly comes across a witness whose
evidence does not contain some exaggeration or embellishment sometimes there could even be a
deliberate attempt to offer embellishment and sometimes in their over anxiety they may give a
slightly exaggerated account. The court can sift the chaff from the grain and find out the truth
from the testimony of the witnesses. Total repulsion of the evidence is unnecessary. The
evidence is to be considered from the point of view of trustworthiness. If this element is
satisfied, it ought to inspire confidence in the mind of the court to accept the stated evidence
though not however in the absence of the same".