Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)
Anand & Anr vs State on 18 November, 2016 cites

Parag Bhati(Juvenile)Thr.Legal ... vs State Of U.P. on 12 May, 2016

24. It is true that there was direction by a coordinate Bench of this Court, while remitting the matter to consider the school documents and other relevant documents. To my mind, in view of the judgment pronounced in Parag Bhati Vs. State of U.P. (supra), matriculation certificate is to be treated as conclusive proof. The petitioners were thus juvenile and the appellate court erred in considering the documents, which led to the issuance of the matriculation certificate.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 15 - Cited by 49 - R K Agrawal - Full Document

Jodhbir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 3 December, 2012

25. Jodhbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab (supra) relied upon by counsel for the complainant was a case wherein the genuineness of the school leaving certificate was given prime importance for (17 of 18) [CRLR-159/2016] ascertaining the date of birth of the juvenile. The Court in that case held that there was no question of placing reliance on any other certificate. The present ruling in no way aids the complainant. The date of birth mentioned in the school certificate was given preference over any other document since the Certificate of the Board of Secondary Education was not available.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 14 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1