Lila Dhar vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 19 August, 1981
7. A perusal of the instructions shows that for academic qualification, 65 marks have been allocated, which are to be worked out in accordance with details given under Eligibility "A" and Additional Eligibility "B". We find that the aforementioned allocation does not suffer from any illegality which would leave any room for the Selection Committee to act arbitrarily. It is well settled that selection criteria for allocation of marks for interview would be dependent on the nature of job, the minimum qualification which is prescribed, the age group from which the selection is to be made and the body to which the task for holding interviews is entrusted. The aforementioned view has been expressed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan , which has been repeatedly followed and applied in the cases of Anzar Ahmed v. State of Bihar and Jaswinder Singh v. State of Jammu & Kashmir . The criteria given in instructions is dated 13.3.2006 (P-1), whereas the interview took place on 11.5.2006.