Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.50 seconds)
____________________________________________________________ vs Rt on 28 December, 2018 cites

M/S. Marshall Sons & Co.(I) Ltd vs M/S.Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd. And Anr on 29 January, 1999

16 Likewise, in Marshals Sons and Co.(I) Ltd. vs. Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd. (supra), it was categorically held that once a decree for possession has been passed and execution is delayed depriving the judgment­creditor of the fruits of decree, it is necessary for the Court to pass appropriate orders so that 'reasonable' mesne profits which may be equivalent to the market rent is paid by a person who is holding over the property.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 117 - M B Shah - Full Document

Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs Unique Erectors (Gujarat) (P) Ltd. & Anr on 24 January, 1989

definition of the word "reasonable'. Reason varies in its conclusions according to the idiosyncrasy of the individual, and the times and circumstances in which he thinks. The reasoning which built up the old scholastic logic sounds now like the jingling of a child's of toy. (See: Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/s Jagan Nath Ashok Kumar and another (1987) 4 SCC 497. and Gujarat Water Supplies and Sewerage Board v. Unique rt Erectors (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd. and another [(1989) 1 SCC 532].
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 288 - S Mukharji - Full Document

M/S. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd vs M/S. Federal Motors Pvt. Ltd on 10 December, 2004

15 In Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd. (supra), it has been clearly laid down that the tenant with the passing of the decree of eviction is liable to pay mesne profits or of compensation for use and occupation charges of the premises at the same rate on which the landlord would have been able rt to let out the premises and earn rent if the tenant would have vacated the premises.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 729 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Mrs. Rena Drego vs Lalchand Soni, Etc on 5 March, 1998

18 What is 'reasonable' is difficult to define and this expression being a relative term is required to be considered vis­à­vis, the fact situation obtaining in a particular case. A of three Hon'ble Judge Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rena Drego (Mrs) vs. Lalchand Soni and others (1998) 3 rt SCC 341, considered the expression 'reasonable' in the following terms:­ [9] It is difficult to give an exact definition of the word 'reasonable'. It is often said that "an attempt to give a specific meaning to the word 'reasonable' is trying to count what is not number and measure what is not space." The author of 'Words and Phrases" (Permanent Edition) has quoted from In re Nice and Schreiber, 123 F, 987, 999 to give a plausible meaning for the said word. He says "the expression 'reasonable' is a relative term, and the facts of the particular controversy must be considered before the question as to what constitutes reasonable can be determined." It is not meant to be expedient or convenient but certainly something more than that.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 150 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Shri Shiv Shanker Kesari on 14 September, 2007

19 The expression reasonable again came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Shiv Shankar Kesari, (2007) 7 SCC 798. It was held as under:­ "[8] The word "reasonable" has in law the prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those circumstances of which the actor, called on to act reasonably, knows or ought to know. It is difficult to give an exact definition of the word 'reasonable'.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 2363 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... vs Kamla Mills Ltd on 11 July, 2003

The author of 'Words and Phrases' (Permanent Edition) has quoted from in re Nice & Schreiber 123 F. 987, 988 to give a plausible meaning for the said word. He says, "the expression 'reasonable' is a relative term, and the facts of the particular controversy must be considered before the question as to what constitutes reasonable can be determined". It is not meant to be expedient or convenient but certainly something more than that. [10] The word 'reasonable' signifies "in accordance with reason". In the ultimate analysis it is a question of fact, whether a particular act is reasonable or not depends on the circumstances in a given situation. (See: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another v. Kamla Mills Ltd. (2003) 6 SCC 315)."
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 92 - Full Document

Veerayee Ammal vs Seeni Ammal on 19 October, 2001

not excessive or immoderate". An act is said to be reasonable when it is conformable or agreeable to reason, having regard to the facts of the particular controversy. In other words of 'reasonable' would mean what is just, fair and equitable in contradiction to anything whimsical, capricious etc. The word rt 'reasonable' has in law prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those circumstances of which the person concerned is called upon to act reasonably knows or ought to know as to what was reasonable. It may be unreasonable to give an exact definition of the word 'reasonable'. The reason varies in its conclusion according to idiosyncrasy of the individual and the time and circumstances in which he thinks, as has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Veerayee Ammal vs. Seeni Ammal (2002) 1 SCC 134.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 262 - Full Document
1   2 Next