cites: 667935

Bhupati Nath Smrititirtha vs Ram Lal Maitra on 28 August, 1909

"As explained in that case, the purpose of making a gift to a temple is not to confer a benefit on God but to confer a benefit on those who worship in that temple, by making it possible for them to have the worship conducted in a proper and impressive manner. This is the sense in which a temple and its endowments are regarded as a public trust".

Calcutta High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 36 - Full Document

Babu Bhagwan Din vs Gir Har Saroop on 10 October, 1939

In Mundancheri Koman v. Achuthan(2), which was referred to and followed in Babu Bhagwan Din v Gir Har Saroon(1), the distinction between user in respect of an institution which is initially proved to have been private and one which is not, is thus expressed:

Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 74 - Full Document

Haji Mahammad Nabi Shirazi And Ors. vs Province Of Bengal And Ors. on 6 August, 1941

In Nabi Shirazi v. Province of Bengal (supra), the question was whether a wakf created by a deed of the year 1806 was a public or a private 765 endowment. Referring to a recital in the deed that the settlor had no children, Khundkar J. observed at p. 217:

Calcutta High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

Mundarcheri Koman Alias Mundancheri ... vs Thachangath Puthan Vitill Achuthan ... on 14 December, 1928

In Mundancheri Koman v. Achuthan(2), which was referred to and followed in Babu Bhagwan Din v Gir Har Saroon(1), the distinction between user in respect of an institution which is initially proved to have been private and one which is not, is thus expressed:

Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 39 - Full Document

Section 109 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 445

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

Search Results Page

Refine Search