Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)

Shilpa Sailesh vs Varun Sreenivasan on 1 May, 2023

5. We were of the opinion that a quietus would be possible only by severing the marriage ties but at the same time ensuring that the wife, who was in an employment before marriage and presumably left it to move out with her husband to his work place, is not left in the lurch. We are fortified in this view by Shilpa Sailesh Vs. Varun Sreenivasan1 which expounded on the ambit and scope of Article 142 of the Constitution of India, which enables ‘complete justice’ in a ‘cause or matter’, in relation to matrimonial matters; specifically, the provision to sever marital ties on mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act. The legislative intent behind incorporating sub-section (2) to Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was found, to enable time to the parties to introspect and consider their decision to separate, before a second motion is moved; when a decree of divorce is sought on a joint petition filed by the parties. The Constitutional Bench noticed cases of exceptional hardship where after some years of acrimonious litigations and prolonged suffering, parties 1 [2023] 5 S.C.R. 165 4 jointly pray for dissolution of marriage and seek a waiver of the need to make a second motion; where it could be allowed when the divorce is inevitable on account of irreconcilable differences evident from the allegations and aspersions made against each other and in certain cases by reason of the multiple litigations making the continuation of the marital relationship an impossibility. The said finding was on the powers of the Court in a joint application for divorce on mutual consent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 86 - Cited by 21 - S K Kaul - Full Document
1