Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.30 seconds)The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 23 in The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
M/S Electrothem (India) Ltd vs Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai & Ors on 2 August, 2016
7.6 Another judgment in case of M/s. Electrotherm Ltd.
(supra) by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.7222
of 2016 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.16860 of 2012, it is
observed that;
Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs Rohit Prajapati . on 1 April, 2020
5.2 Mr. Oza thus stated that in the judgment of Alembic
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (supra) the Apex Court has dealt with the
concept of 'ex-post- facto EC' where it was noted that the
environment law cannot countenance the notion of an 'ex post
facto clearance', which would be contrary to both the
Page 11 of 36
Downloaded on : Fri Aug 02 21:17:09 IST 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.RA/41/2020 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/07/2024
undefined
precautionary principle as well as the need for sustainable
development.