Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Punjab Tenancy Rules [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Punjab Tenancy Rules [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Punjab Tenancy Rules [Entire Act]
The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948
Section 4 in The Punjab Tenancy Rules [Entire Act]
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010
21. In exercise of powers under Article 227 , this Court is not
expected to interfere with a finding within the jurisdiction of the
authorities constituted under the Tenancy Act .except where the
findings were perverse and not based on any material evidence or it
resulted in manifest injustice. Except to the limited extent indicated
above, this Court has no jurisdiction. Upon perusal of the concurrent
findings, I find no reason to interfere with the findings of fact. The
Sairaj 14 of 15
::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2024 01:36:30 :::
wp1745-97f.doc
Apex Court in the case of Shalini Shyam Shetty vs Rajendra Shankar
Patil1 has held that in exercise of its power of superintendence, the
High Court cannot interfere to correct mere errors of law or fact or just
because another view than the one taken by the tribunals or Courts
subordinate to it, is a possible view. In other words, the jurisdiction has
to be very sparingly exercised.
1