Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Red Rose School on 7 February, 2007

5. We have perused the case records, heard the rival contentions and we find that in the detailed paper book filed by the assessee, there is a detailed questionnaire raising various queries by the office of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) and to which assessee has given answers. The assessee therein has categorically stated that the trust does not owe any immoveable asset. Since the trust was formed on 21/4/2015, the first accounting year has not yet ended. The statement of affairs as on date was enclosed and [ITA No.190/LKW/2016] 3 no fund has been set apart since formation of the trust on 21/4/2015. The assessee has also given the name of the trust with address, PAN, Mobile number and the original documents of trust deed registered with the Sub-Registrar, Gyanpur Bhadohi was also provided before the Department. Now it is not disputed that it is a new trust and the assessee had applied for its registration under section 12AA of the Act. It is also not a case where Registration is sought for after a long period of time after the trust was formed. We take guidance from the judicial principles as enumerated in the decisions of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. Meenakshi Amma endowment Trust (supra) and Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Red Rose School (supra) wherein it has been held by the Hon'ble Courts that the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax while considering the application for registration under section 12AA of the Act will essentially look into the genuineness of the activities of the trust or the institution and make enquiries in this regard as necessary, but at that time the scope of 12AA does not seek that the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax will also see whether the income derived by the trust is spent for charitable purposes or whether the trust is earning profit or not. So far as the case of the present assessee is concerned, it was a new trust and all the details as sought by the Department were duly submitted and even trust deed was filed wherein the objects of the trust were clearly mentioned. When these criteria are complied with, then registration under section 12AA ought to have been granted to the assessee. We, taking guidance from the aforesaid judicial principles, are of the considered view that in the instant case registration under section 12AA of the Act should be granted to the assessee once as per object clause the genuineness of [ITA No.190/LKW/2016] 4 the activities of the trust is established. This fact is not disputed by the ld. D.R. We, therefore, for the reasons stated hereinabove, direct the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) to grant registration to the assessee trust under section 12AA of the Act.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 122 - P Kant - Full Document

Director Of Income Tax Exemptions vs Meenakshi Amma Endowment Trust on 14 September, 2017

5. We have perused the case records, heard the rival contentions and we find that in the detailed paper book filed by the assessee, there is a detailed questionnaire raising various queries by the office of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) and to which assessee has given answers. The assessee therein has categorically stated that the trust does not owe any immoveable asset. Since the trust was formed on 21/4/2015, the first accounting year has not yet ended. The statement of affairs as on date was enclosed and [ITA No.190/LKW/2016] 3 no fund has been set apart since formation of the trust on 21/4/2015. The assessee has also given the name of the trust with address, PAN, Mobile number and the original documents of trust deed registered with the Sub-Registrar, Gyanpur Bhadohi was also provided before the Department. Now it is not disputed that it is a new trust and the assessee had applied for its registration under section 12AA of the Act. It is also not a case where Registration is sought for after a long period of time after the trust was formed. We take guidance from the judicial principles as enumerated in the decisions of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. Meenakshi Amma endowment Trust (supra) and Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Red Rose School (supra) wherein it has been held by the Hon'ble Courts that the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax while considering the application for registration under section 12AA of the Act will essentially look into the genuineness of the activities of the trust or the institution and make enquiries in this regard as necessary, but at that time the scope of 12AA does not seek that the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax will also see whether the income derived by the trust is spent for charitable purposes or whether the trust is earning profit or not. So far as the case of the present assessee is concerned, it was a new trust and all the details as sought by the Department were duly submitted and even trust deed was filed wherein the objects of the trust were clearly mentioned. When these criteria are complied with, then registration under section 12AA ought to have been granted to the assessee. We, taking guidance from the aforesaid judicial principles, are of the considered view that in the instant case registration under section 12AA of the Act should be granted to the assessee once as per object clause the genuineness of [ITA No.190/LKW/2016] 4 the activities of the trust is established. This fact is not disputed by the ld. D.R. We, therefore, for the reasons stated hereinabove, direct the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) to grant registration to the assessee trust under section 12AA of the Act.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1