Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.84 seconds)
Rakesh Dhawan vs State Of Punjab And Another on 24 March, 2022 cites

Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994

"2. The State Government has decided to review the policy on compassionate grounds under the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs. State of Haryana, referred as above. The Government has reconsidered all the above instructions issued from time to time on compassionate appointments and has decided to renew the policy to provide the benefit only to deserving cases as per directions of the Apex Court referred in Para 1 above.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 2647 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Parkash Ram vs State Of Punjab And Another on 5 April, 2011

In the interregnum, father of petitioner, namely, Ram Parkash, filed CWP No.3698-2014 (Ram Parkash Vs. State of Punjab and another), for seeking promotion of "deceased government employee" from Inspector to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police; from the date her immediate junior; namely, Kashmir Kaur was promoted. Since the outcome of above writ petition was likely to have material bearing for the entitlement of petitioner on compassionate ground, therefore, his case was kept pending by respondent No.2 till the final decision of the writ petition. Respondent No.1 finding the claim of "deceased government employee" as genuine, granted her retrospective promotion on the post of Dy.S.P. w.e.f. 24.06.2011 vide order dated 20.04.2017. In SANJAY GUPTA 2022.05.26 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -3- view of the above development, the writ petition filed by Ram Parkash was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous on 26.04.2017.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - R Bahri - Full Document
1