Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur on 12 September, 2017
6. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Amardeep Singh Vs.
Harveen Kaur, reported in 2017 (3) MWN (Civil) 458 (SC) : 2017 (5) CTC
665 (SC) has held that the possibility to waive the cooling period can be
considered by the Family Court provided in the opinion of the Court that there
is no possibility for reconciliation.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
K.Mohanarangan vs Nil on 22 July, 2022
7. The Madras High Court (Principal Seat of this Court), Chennai in the
case of K.Mohanarangan and others Vs. Nil, reported in 2022 (3) MWN
(Civil) 653 by relying the above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Amardeep Singh has observed that “The whole object of giving the cooling
period is to just to give an opportunity to the couples to recall their good old
_____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No. 3 of 6
C.R.P.(MD) No.2080 of 2023
days and iron out the differences by valuing the relationship and re-unite.
When the subsistence of marriage is seen as a burden and does not link with
the emotional, sexual and physical well-being of the couples and all other
attendant circumstances of their life, the marriage will naturally loose its life
and there cannot be any scope for reunion of the couples between whom there
is love lost and life lost.”
1