Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37 (0.29 seconds)Section 4 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Article 20 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Dr. Indramani Pyarelal Gupta vs W. R. Nathu And Others on 11 April, 1962
36. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant points out that in the decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court 'Dr. Indramani Pyarelal Gupta V. 'W.R. Nath & Ors.',
April 11, 1962, AIR 1963 SC 274 at paragraph 14 it is observed that - "What we
are here concerned with is whether it is legally competent to vest a particular
power in a statutory body, and in regard to this, the proper rule of interpretation
of this would be that unless the nature of the power is such as to be incompatible
for the purpose for which the body is created, or unless the particular power is
contra-indicated by and specific provision of the enactment bringing the body into
existence, any power which would further the provisions of the act could be legally
conferred on it".
Section 8 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Renusagar Power Co. Ltd vs General Electric Co on 7 October, 1993
18. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant emphatically projects an argument
that the ambit of Section 4 is not confined only to filing of applications u/s 9(1)
of the Code, but extends to all matters under part II including the admission of
such applications u/s 9(5)(i) is clear from the use of expression 'relating to the
Insolvency & Liquidation of Corporate Debtors' and refers to the decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court 'Renusagar Power Company Ltd.' V. 'General
Electric Company' (1984), 4 SCC page 679 (para 25), followed in 'Govind
Prasad Sharma' V. 'Doon Valley Officers Cooperative Housing Society
Limited' (2018) 11 SC 501 (para 4); 'Thyssen Stahlunion GMBH' V. 'SAIL
(1999) 9 SCC 334 (para 23,24); 'Mansukhlal Dhanraj Jain' V. 'Eknath Vithal
Ogale (1995) 2 SCC 665; 'Dhanrajmal Gobindram' V. 'Shamji Kalidas & Co.'
AIR 1961 SC 1285; 'Navin Chemicals' V. 'Collector of Customs'-(1993) 4
SCC 320.
Govind Prasad Sharma vs Doon Valley Officers Cooperative ... on 23 August, 2017
18. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant emphatically projects an argument
that the ambit of Section 4 is not confined only to filing of applications u/s 9(1)
of the Code, but extends to all matters under part II including the admission of
such applications u/s 9(5)(i) is clear from the use of expression 'relating to the
Insolvency & Liquidation of Corporate Debtors' and refers to the decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court 'Renusagar Power Company Ltd.' V. 'General
Electric Company' (1984), 4 SCC page 679 (para 25), followed in 'Govind
Prasad Sharma' V. 'Doon Valley Officers Cooperative Housing Society
Limited' (2018) 11 SC 501 (para 4); 'Thyssen Stahlunion GMBH' V. 'SAIL
(1999) 9 SCC 334 (para 23,24); 'Mansukhlal Dhanraj Jain' V. 'Eknath Vithal
Ogale (1995) 2 SCC 665; 'Dhanrajmal Gobindram' V. 'Shamji Kalidas & Co.'
AIR 1961 SC 1285; 'Navin Chemicals' V. 'Collector of Customs'-(1993) 4
SCC 320.
Mansukhlal Dhanraj Jain And Ors. Etc vs Eknath Vithal Ogale Etc on 8 February, 1995
18. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant emphatically projects an argument
that the ambit of Section 4 is not confined only to filing of applications u/s 9(1)
of the Code, but extends to all matters under part II including the admission of
such applications u/s 9(5)(i) is clear from the use of expression 'relating to the
Insolvency & Liquidation of Corporate Debtors' and refers to the decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court 'Renusagar Power Company Ltd.' V. 'General
Electric Company' (1984), 4 SCC page 679 (para 25), followed in 'Govind
Prasad Sharma' V. 'Doon Valley Officers Cooperative Housing Society
Limited' (2018) 11 SC 501 (para 4); 'Thyssen Stahlunion GMBH' V. 'SAIL
(1999) 9 SCC 334 (para 23,24); 'Mansukhlal Dhanraj Jain' V. 'Eknath Vithal
Ogale (1995) 2 SCC 665; 'Dhanrajmal Gobindram' V. 'Shamji Kalidas & Co.'
AIR 1961 SC 1285; 'Navin Chemicals' V. 'Collector of Customs'-(1993) 4
SCC 320.
Dhanrajamal Gobindram vs Shamji Kalidas And Co. on 27 February, 1961
18. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant emphatically projects an argument
that the ambit of Section 4 is not confined only to filing of applications u/s 9(1)
of the Code, but extends to all matters under part II including the admission of
such applications u/s 9(5)(i) is clear from the use of expression 'relating to the
Insolvency & Liquidation of Corporate Debtors' and refers to the decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court 'Renusagar Power Company Ltd.' V. 'General
Electric Company' (1984), 4 SCC page 679 (para 25), followed in 'Govind
Prasad Sharma' V. 'Doon Valley Officers Cooperative Housing Society
Limited' (2018) 11 SC 501 (para 4); 'Thyssen Stahlunion GMBH' V. 'SAIL
(1999) 9 SCC 334 (para 23,24); 'Mansukhlal Dhanraj Jain' V. 'Eknath Vithal
Ogale (1995) 2 SCC 665; 'Dhanrajmal Gobindram' V. 'Shamji Kalidas & Co.'
AIR 1961 SC 1285; 'Navin Chemicals' V. 'Collector of Customs'-(1993) 4
SCC 320.