Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.38 seconds)Section 41 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 69 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014
But, here in the
instant case, it is seen that there is no compliance of Section 41/41A of Cr.P.C.,
which is mandatorily required to be followed as per the guideline of Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and
reiterated in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. CBI.
Section 47 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
Section 48 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
But, here in the
instant case, it is seen that there is no compliance of Section 41/41A of Cr.P.C.,
which is mandatorily required to be followed as per the guideline of Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and
reiterated in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. CBI.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Y.S.Jagan Mohan Reddy vs C.B.I on 9 May, 2013
In that context, he also relied on a
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in the case of Y.S. Jagan Mohan
Reddy Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (Criminal Appeal No. 730 of
2013) and emphasized on paragraph Nos. 15 & 16 of the judgment, which
reads as under: