Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.35 seconds)

Kuttappa vs Katrikolli Somaiah on 9 August, 1991

This Court, by its order dated 31.7.2012, has permitted the first respondent to make necessary applications. Thereafter, I.A.Nos.10 and 11 have been filed. The Trial Court has allowed the applications. This Court in KUTTAPPA vs. KATRIKOLLI SOMAIAH reported in 1991(4) KLJ page 270 has held, when LR., has come on record in the revision petition, non-filing of LR., application in the original suit will not result in abatement of the suit. No application is required. It is sufficient if it is brought to the notice of the Court. This decision is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. The first respondent has prosecuted CRP and SLP as LR. The 6 impugned order does not call for interference. There is no merit in these writ petitions and therefore, they are liable to be dismissed.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1