Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.63 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
B.R. Kapoor vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr on 21 September, 2001
28. The learned Advocate General by placing reliance upon the said
decision, would submit that the counter affidavit of the third respondent
contains detailed reasons as to the purpose for which, the memorial sought
to be constructed in honour and memory of late Selvi J.Jayalalitha, former
Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and in the event of the memorial come into
being, contributions made by her for the welfare of the people and for the
development of the State, would be made known to everybody and since it
is for public purpose, the policy decision taken by the State Government to
erect such a memorial cannot be faulted with.
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of A.P vs S. Narasimha Kumar & Ors on 13 July, 2006
In State of A.P. v. S.Narasimha Kumar and Others [(2006) 5
SCC 683], the question arose for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme
Court was as to whether an appeal from a composite order of sentence
combining the substantive imprisonment with fine is for the purposes of
Section 431 CrPC (Old Code) corresponding to Section 394 CrPC, is not an
appeal from the sentence of fine. It is relevant to extract Paragraph No.9 of
the said decision: