Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.23 seconds)

Mr. R.D. Hattangadi vs M/S Pest Control (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 6 January, 1995

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 1698 - N P Singh - Full Document

Jagdish vs Mohan on 6 March, 2018

11. The issue regarding calculation of prospective increment of income in future of self employed individuals, came up for consideration before the Hon'ble three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagdish vs. Mohan and others (2018) 4 SCC 571, wherein it was categorically held that the awards in motor accidents cases of death or injury are now to be judged and determined in light of the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680, and it was observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 229 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

In the judgment of the Constitution Bench in Pranay Sethi (supra), this Court has held that the benefit of future prospects should not be confined only to those who have a permanent job and would extend to self- employed individuals. In the case of a self-employed person, an addition of 40 per cent of the established income should be made where the age of the victim at the time of the accident was below 40 years. Hence, in the present case, the appellant would be entitled to an ::: Downloaded on - 25/11/2019 20:27:25 :::HCHP 11 enhancement of Rs. 2400/-towards loss of future prospects.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Ramesh Chandra vs Randhir Singh And Ors.(Vice Versa) on 3 May, 1990

In K Suresh v. New India Assurance Company Ltd., (2012) 12 SCC 274 this Court adverted to the earlier judgments in Ramesh Chandra v Randhir Singh (1990) 3 SCC 723 and B Kothandapani v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited (2011) 6 SCC 420. The Court held that compensation can be granted for disability as well as for loss of future earnings for the first head relates to the impairment of a person's capacity while the other relates to the sphere of pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life by the person himself.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 83 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

B.Kothandapani vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corp.Ltd on 12 May, 2011

In K Suresh v. New India Assurance Company Ltd., (2012) 12 SCC 274 this Court adverted to the earlier judgments in Ramesh Chandra v Randhir Singh (1990) 3 SCC 723 and B Kothandapani v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited (2011) 6 SCC 420. The Court held that compensation can be granted for disability as well as for loss of future earnings for the first head relates to the impairment of a person's capacity while the other relates to the sphere of pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life by the person himself.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 105 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Govind Yadav vs The New India Insurance Co.Ltd on 1 November, 2011

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 548 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1   2 Next