Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.31 seconds)Section 111 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 86 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The U.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1999
Section 50 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... vs Reliance Energy Ltd. & Ors on 14 August, 2007
The Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory
Commission Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 381
held that section 86(1) (f) of The Electricity Act 2003 which
prescribes the adjudicatory functions of the State
Commission does not encompass within its domain
complaints of individual consumers and that it only provides
that the Commission can adjudicate upon the disputes
between the licensees and the generating companies and
to refer any such dispute to arbitration. The Supreme Court
affirmed that this does not include in it a grievance of an
individual consumer. The Supreme Court further held that a
proper forum for that is section 42(5) and thereafter section
42(6), read with the Regulation, if any, which provide for
establishing the CGRF and the Ombudsman.
New India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Shanti Misra, Adult on 10 October, 1975
Admittedly, the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum was
in existence when the impugned order was passed. The
learned counsel for the Appellant, Mr. Misra, says that even
if the commission has entertained the petition No. 148 of
2003 on a wrong or right assumption of jurisdiction the
petition was required to be transferred to the Consumer
Grievance Redressal Forum. The judgment of the Supreme
Court in the matter of New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt
Shanti Misra (1975) 2 SCC 840 has been cited in support.
In paragraph 5 of the judgment the Supreme Court related
to the change of Forum as well as the period of limitation
on account of amendment in section 110 of the Motor
Vehicles Act. The Supreme Court made the following clear
observations in respect of change of Forum by a new law.
Polyplex Corporation Limited vs Uttaranchal Power Corporation ... on 30 March, 2007
09) In our earlier judgment, in M/s. Polyplex Corporation Ltd.
Vs. Uttaranchal Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. in appeal
No.220 of 2006, this Tribunal held that no
petition/appeal/application lies before any Regulatory
Commission or this Tribunal in respect of billing matters.
We also held that no petition/appeal/application lies to any
Regulatory Commission or Appellate Tribunal from an
order passed by the Ombudsman or CGRF or any other
body like the Appellate Committee.