cites: 67428923

(India Tv) Independent News Service Pvt ... vs India Broadcast Live Llc And Ors. on 10 July, 2007

The decision in India TV, Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. (Supra) was distinguished by observing that there was an intent on the part of the channel to increase its subscriber base in India and the channel could actually be subscribed in India. As such, there was a conscious targeting of customers in India, which is missing in the present case.

Delhi High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 30 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Banyan Tree Holding (P) Limited vs A. Murali Krishna Reddy & Anr. on 23 November, 2009

Banyan Tree (Supra) approved of even bonafide trap sales within a particular geography to attract territorial jurisdiction of Courts.

Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 70 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Burger King Corporation vs Techchand Shewakramani & Ors on 27 August, 2018

In Burger King Corporation (Supra), it was held that even promotion activities undertaken on a website would be enough to attract territorial jurisdiction of Courts where website can be accessed.

Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 20 - P M Singh - Full Document

Millennium & Copthorne International ... vs Aryans Plaza Services Private Limited & ... on 8 October, 2018

16. We have looked out to find some more useful references and found one in Lifestyle Equities CV and another company v. Amazon UK Services Ltd and other companies, [2022] EWCA Civ 552. In this case, England and Wales Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA ANAND FAO(OS) (COMM) 62/2022 Page 9 of 18 Signing Date:19.09.2022 18:00:54 Court of Appeals has discussed in a more incisive way as to what targeting would mean. Following are the useful paragraphs from the said judgment:

Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 11 - Y Khanna - Full Document