Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.25 seconds)Section 33A in The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Consumer Protection Act, 2019
M/S. Goel Ganga Developers India Pvt. ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 10 August, 2018
(ii) We accept the amount of Rs.3,29,29,687/- (Rupees Three Crore
Twenty Nine Lakhs Twenty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and
Eighty Seven only) assessed by the Joint Committee as
Page 41 of 44
environmental compensation payable by the 2nd Respondent to
the State Pollution Control Board for carrying out the
constructions without obtaining Environmental Clearance (EC),
as even though the same was assessed on different heads,
applying the principles laid down by the Hon‟ble Apex Court
in Goel Ganga Developers India Private Limited Vs. Union of
India & Ors. reported in (2019) 9 SCC 288.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 14 in The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
Keystone Realtors Pvt. Ltd. vs Anil V. Tharthare on 3 December, 2019
54. It is well settled law that avoidance of legal provisions by lawful method
though permissible to some extent, but if it is evasion of law detrimental
to environment cannot be permitted. If splitting of projects is being
adopted by the Project Proponent to avoid obtaining Environmental
Clearance (EC), then it amounts to evasion. Further, the Hon‟ble Apex
Court in Keystone Realtors Private Limited Vs. Anil V. Tharthare &
Ors.reported in (2020) 2 SCC 66 has clearly held that the provisions of
law should be interpreted in a manner which is in consonance with the
object and the purpose of the legislation or delegated legislation as a
whole. The Tribunal applying the principles of "Precautionary Principle"