Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)
Shri Bheem Singh Meena vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 November, 2009 cites

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors vs Ram Ratan Yadav on 26 February, 2003

(iii) In yet another case in Kendriya Vidyalalay Sangathan and Others Vs. Ram Ratan Yadav reported in 2003 (3) SCC 437 somewhat the same argument was advanced as by the applicant herein that he did not understand the question having studied in Hindi medium. In the said case also in the Attestation Form, it was asked whether he had ever been prosecuted or convicted by court of any offence and if any case was pending against him in any court at the time of filling up the Attestation Form. The respondent therein had replied to both the questions in the negative and certified that the information given by him was correct to the best of his knowledge although a criminal case was pending against him at that time. In the said case also the contention raised by the respondent was that his medium was Hindi throughout, therefore, he did not understand the question correctly. After dealing with all the contentions raised by the appellant therein, it was held by the Honble Supreme Court as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 263 - S V Patil - Full Document

Dr. Vikram Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 20 October, 1997

13. Counsel for the applicant has relied on some judgments given by the Tribunal viz. Vikram Singh Vs. U.O.I. & Others (OA No. 1795/2005) and Shri S.C. Gupta and Others Vs. U.O.I. and Others (OA Nos. 452/2002 and 453/2002). However, since law has been laid down by the Honble Supreme Court, therefore, any judgment given contrary to the Supreme Court judgments, by the Tribunal or Punjab and Haryana High Court would be of no relevance.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - K Venkataswami - Full Document

Dharmarathmakara R .A. Ramaswamy ... vs The Educational Appellate Tribunal & ... on 20 August, 1999

8. The law is well settled that once the charge itself is admitted, there is nothing more required to be looked into by the Inquiry Officer. At this juncture it would be relevant to quote from the judgment of Honble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmarathmakara Raibahadur Arcot Ramaswamy Mudaliar Educational Institution Vs. Educational Appellate Tribunal and Another reported in 1999 Vol.7 SCC 37 wherein it was held as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 80 - Full Document
1