Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)

Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union Of India on 23 November, 2017

Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India, (2018) 11 SCC 1. This provision mandates the police officer to record his reasons in writing while making the arrest. Thus, a police officer is duty-bound to record the reasons for arrest in writing. The consequence of non-compliance with Section 41 shall certainly inure to the benefit of the person suspected of the offence. On the scope and objective of Section 41 and 41A, it is obvious that they are facets of Article 21 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 101 - Cited by 1782 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Vimal Kumar And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28 January, 2021

The submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgement of this Court dated 28.01.2021 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 others vs. State of UP and 3 others) in which guidelines have been framed following the judgement of the Apex Court in different cases, relating to offences providing punishment of seven years or less.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 3630 - G Chowdhary - Full Document
1