Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.18 seconds)Sm. Sima Rani Mohanti vs Puspa Rani Pal on 13 May, 1977
In another case titled as Smt. Sima Rani Mohanty Vs. Pushpa
Rani reported as AIR 1978 Calcutta 140, it was held that any interest,
however, slight and even the bare possibility of an interest is sufficient
to entitle a person to make an application for revocation.
Sadananda Pyne vs Harinam Sha And Anr. on 16 September, 1949
27. The Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in
case Sadanand Pyne Vs. Harinam Sha and Anr. reported as AIR 1950
Calcutta 179 has observed that in order to have the locus standi to
apply for revocation of the probate, a person must have an interest in
the estate of the deceased presuming he had died intestate.
George Anthony Harris vs Millicent Spencer on 11 August, 1932
In case titled as George Anthony Harris Vs. Millicent Spencer
reported as AIR 1933 Bombay 370, it was held that a person applying
for revocation for the grant must show that he has an interest in the
alleged Will i.e. in the estate of the deceased disposed of by the
alleged Will. There must be some interest and even the slightest
interest is sufficient to apply for revocation.
Section 264 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 276 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 283 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Dharam Devi And Ors. vs Bishamber Nath on 16 September, 1971
In case titled as Dharam Devi & Ors. Vs. Bishamber Nath
reported as ILR (1971) II Delhi 661, it was held that the appellants are
not the legal heirs of the testator and had no interest in the property
bequeathed under the will. It was held that the appellants had no locus
standi to ask for the revocation of the probate.
R.N. Gupta And Ors. vs State And Ors. on 1 July, 1995
28. Our own Hon'ble High Court in case titled as R.N. Gupta
& Ors. Vs. State reported as 1995 Rajdhani Law Reporter 474,
12
observed that application for revocation lies only if the applicant had a
share in the estates of the deceased, if latter had died intestate.
1