Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.53 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 354 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 356 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 27 March, 2014
Similarly, the guidelines laid down in Narinder Singh and
Others vs. State of Punjab and Another (2014) 6 SCC 466 [paragraph
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed By:SHITU
NAGPAL
Signing Date:29.04.2022
12:01:56 W.P.(Crl) 938/2022 Page 2 of 3
29.4] contemplate that FIRs in cases where there is/was a pre-existing
familial or other personal relationship between the parties may be
considered in this context. Such proceedings, can be quashed if it would
meet the ends of justice or prevent the abuse of the process of the Court.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
5. The power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings on the
ground of a settlement has been considered by the Supreme Court in a
number of cases. While emphasising that the exercise of the power under
Section 482 of the CrPC in a particular case would depend upon the facts
and circumstances of the case and no hard and fast categorisation is
possible, the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and
Another (2012) 10 SCC 303 [paragraph 58] observed that the wrong is
basically to the victim and the quashing of criminal proceedings in such a
case may be appropriate even if the offences have not been made
compoundable.
1