Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.78 seconds)Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018
Supreme Court in the case of SARLA VERMA AND OTHERS v..
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER, reported in
(2009) 6 SCC 121, 15 multiplier is applicable, then it comes to
Rs.1,64,540/- X 12 X 15 = Rs.2,96,17,200/-. The same is
awarded under the head loss of dependency. Keeping in mind
the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SARLA
VERMA and in the case of PRANAY SETHI (supra); so also, the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of MAGMA
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. NANU RAM ALIAS
CHUHRU RAM AND OTHERS reported in (2018)18 SCC 130, the
claimants are entitled for following compensation:
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022
Supreme Court in the case of SARLA VERMA AND OTHERS v..
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER, reported in
(2009) 6 SCC 121, 15 multiplier is applicable, then it comes to
Rs.1,64,540/- X 12 X 15 = Rs.2,96,17,200/-. The same is
awarded under the head loss of dependency. Keeping in mind
the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SARLA
VERMA and in the case of PRANAY SETHI (supra); so also, the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of MAGMA
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. NANU RAM ALIAS
CHUHRU RAM AND OTHERS reported in (2018)18 SCC 130, the
claimants are entitled for following compensation:
Section 134 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
1