Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.46 seconds)
Sadhna Mittal vs Chaudhary Devi Lal University, Sirsa, ... on 12 July, 2021 cites

State Bank Of Bikaner & Jaipur & Others vs Jag Mohan Lal on 13 September, 1988

In judgment of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and others vs. Jag Mohan Lal, 1989 AIR (SC) 75, it was held by Hon'ble the Apex Court that right of extension in service is not a legal right but it is a benefit, however, this benefit is not a concession but is a privilege, to which, an officer is entitled to after years of hard work in the respondent-Bank.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 46 - K J Shetty - Full Document

D.C. Aggarwal (Dead) By Lrs vs State Bank Of India And Another on 27 April, 2006

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos. 959- 960 of 2000 titled as D.C. Aggarwal (Dead) by LRs versus State Bank of 4 of 8 ::: Downloaded on - 12-07-2021 23:47:38 ::: CWP-12332-2021 5 India and another, decided on 27.04.2006 has held that extension in service cannot be claimed as a right and the Court cannot issue any such directions. The relevant paragraph of the said judgment is as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 41 - Full Document

Kailash Chandra vs Union Of India on 16 March, 1961

In said judgment, decisions rendered in cases Kailash Chandra vs. Union of India, AIR 1961 SC 1346, B.N. Mishra vs. State, (1965) 1 SCR 693 and State of Assam vs. Pramadhar, (1971) 1 SCR 503, were discussed. It was held that a Government servant has no right to continue in service beyond the age of superannuation and in case he or she is retained beyond that age, it is only the discretion of the government. It was further held that in case certain persons were found fit to be continued in service, it does not mean that the others, who were not found fit, had been discriminated. The whole idea is of continuing only the efficient people in service in stead of pleading long length of service.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 89 - K C Gupta - Full Document

Rajinder Kumar Kamboj @ Roshan Lal vs State Of Haryana And Others on 26 November, 2020

A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.25444 of 2014 6 of 8 ::: Downloaded on - 12-07-2021 23:47:38 ::: CWP-12332-2021 7 titled as Roshan Lal versus State of Haryana and others, decided on 18.10.2016 has held that right of extension in service is not a legal right but it is a benefit and Government servant has no right to continue in service beyond the age of superannuation and in case, he or she is retained beyond that age, it is only the discretion of the Government. The relevant paragraph of the said judgment is as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - S Muralidhar - Full Document
1