Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.46 seconds)Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Rajesh Singh & Ors vs State Of U.P on 28 March, 2011
13. As observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Rajesh Singh & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in
Page 8 of 10
Downloaded on : Thu Feb 03 21:04:29 IST 2022
R/CR.MA/2780/2022 ORDER DATED: 03/02/2022
(2011) 11 SCC 444 and in the case of Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar
Khan and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
(2011) 6 SCC 394, while dealing with the judgment of acquittal,
unless reasoning by the learned trial Court is found to be
perverse, the acquittal cannot be upset. It is further observed
that High Court's interference in such appeal in somewhat
circumscribed and if the view taken by the learned trial Court
is possible on the evidence, the High Court should stay its
hands and not interfere in the matter in the belief that if it had
been the trial Court, it might have taken a different view.
Bhaiyamiyan @ Jardar Khan & Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 May, 2011
13. As observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Rajesh Singh & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in
Page 8 of 10
Downloaded on : Thu Feb 03 21:04:29 IST 2022
R/CR.MA/2780/2022 ORDER DATED: 03/02/2022
(2011) 11 SCC 444 and in the case of Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar
Khan and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
(2011) 6 SCC 394, while dealing with the judgment of acquittal,
unless reasoning by the learned trial Court is found to be
perverse, the acquittal cannot be upset. It is further observed
that High Court's interference in such appeal in somewhat
circumscribed and if the view taken by the learned trial Court
is possible on the evidence, the High Court should stay its
hands and not interfere in the matter in the belief that if it had
been the trial Court, it might have taken a different view.