Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Avtar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 July, 2016
(Uploaded on 10/12/2025 at 02:33:37 PM)
(Downloaded on 10/12/2025 at 06:36:42 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:52015-DB] (13 of 20) [SAW-79/2022]
4.7. Learned counsel also controverted the appellant's reliance on
Avtar Singh(supra) and Kamal Singh Meena (supra),
submitting that those decisions turn on their own facts and
primarily concern cases of alleged suppression/false declaration
and subsequent acquittal. In the present case, the issue is not
concealment but the substantive suitability of a person who has
admittedly faced a criminal case for examination cheating to
continue in a highly sensitive armed force.
Union Territory, Chandigarh ... vs Pradeep Kumar on 8 January, 2018
In Union Territory,
Chandigarh Administration v. Pradeep Kumar, (2018) 1 SCC 797,
the Hon'ble Supreme Court emphasised that:
Satish Chandra Yadav vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2022
6.7. In the present case, the antecedent incident relates to
alleged examination malpractice, an act which, regardless of the
subsequent discharge, bears directly upon the attribute of
integrity. Integrity is the core value for induction into a uniformed
force such as the CISF. Applying Avtar Singh(supra) and Satish
Chandra Yadav(supra):
Ravindra Kumar Dayal vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 29 August, 2022
These principles were reaffirmed in Ravindra Kumar v. State of
U.P., (2024) 5 SCC 264, where the Court reiterated that
acquittal or discharge does not create an automatic right to public
(Uploaded on 10/12/2025 at 02:33:37 PM)
(Downloaded on 10/12/2025 at 06:36:42 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:52015-DB] (18 of 20) [SAW-79/2022]
employment and that the nature of the post and the sensitivity of
duties are determinative.
1