Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)
State vs . Mahanand Baghel on 15 May, 2019 cites

Mohan Lal vs The State Of Punjab on 16 August, 2018

11. PW1 HC Naval who is the investigating officer in the present case is also the complainant of the present case. It is well settled law that complainant should not be the investigating officer in the case so as to rule out any ill­will or bias against the accused. The mindset of the complainant ordinarily is holding a grievance against somebody whereas the mandate of the investigating officer is to ascertain the truth. Therefore, in order to allay any fear of bias or ill­will, it is in the fitness of things that the complainant and the IO should not be the same person which is not the case before the court. Reliance placed on the judgment of FIR No. 150/17 State Vs. Mahanand Baghel 4/6 Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case titled as Mohan Lal Vs. State of Punjab, MANU SC/0857/2018.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 543 - N Sinha - Full Document

Hiralal D. Karnavt @ ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 February, 2019

9. In the case in hand, a banner was allegedly affixed on an iron angel. The similar question regarding the defacement of public property by hanging of a board on an electricity pole arose before Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter titled as T S Marwah & Ors Vs. State 2008 (4) JCC 2561 wherein it was held that mere putting the banner on a pole will not get covered by section 3(1) of West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Public Property Act, 1976.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1