Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.32 seconds)Section 17 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
State Of Kerala, Managing Director, ... vs Puttumana Illath Jathavedan ... on 11 February, 1999
8. The jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 is supervisory, not appellate. Interference is warranted
where the impugned order is illegal, suffers from material irregularity, or is
perverse; re-appreciation of evidence as if in appeal is impermissible. The
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed CRL.REV.P. 219/2021 & CRL.REV.P. 223/2021 Page 11 of 19
By:NITIN KAIN
Signing Date:16.10.2025
21:23:56
principle is well settled in the Supreme Court decisions of State of Kerala v.
Puttumana Illath Jathavedan Namboodiri3 and Sanjaysinh Ramrao
Chavan v. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke4. Measured against that yardstick,
the inquiry here is confined to whether the Courts below misdirected
themselves in law in recognising the Respondent's residence protection.