Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.61 seconds)
Sudesh Sharma vs T.C.Bansal on 28 February, 2014 cites

R.S. Nayak vs A.R. Antulay & Anr on 17 April, 1986

In view of the above law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, at the stage of framing of charge, the Court is only to see whether prima facie case is made out or not and not to consider whether this evidence produced on the record will lead to conviction or not. As regarding the law cited by learned counsel for the revision petitioner, in none of the case, it has been held that at the time of framing of charge, the Court is not to see prima facie case. The law cited by learned counsel for the petitioner is on other points. Therefore, the judgments cited by learned counsel for the petitioner are having distinguished facts and will not apply in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 548 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt.Ltd vs Sanjay Choudhary & Ors on 3 October, 2008

I have gone through this judgment and it fully applies to the facts of the present case. As per above cited judgment, the Court is to see only, whether prima facie case is made out or not and not to see that if this evidence would remain unrebutted, will lead to conviction or not, at this stage. On the same point, learned counsel for respondent also cited judgment passed in Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanjoy Choudhary and others, AIR 2009 SC 9, in para Nos.8 and 10 of which, it is held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 317 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Karnataka vs L. Muniswamy & Ors on 3 March, 1977

In State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy MANU/SC/0143/1977 : 1977CRiLJ1125 it was noted that at the stage of framing the charge the court has to apply its mind to the question whether or not there is any ground for presuming the commission of offence by the accused. (Underlined for emphasis). The Court has to see while considering the question of framing the charge as to whether the material brought on record could reasonably connect the accused with the trial. Nothing more is required to be inquired into.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 1534 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 Next